130nm sits at an important intersection between mature analog processes and more integration-friendly digital nodes. It is often chosen when designers need more density than 180nm, without the complexity of advanced nodes. Cost at 130nm is often misunderstood — especially when comparing MPW and full mask options.
This article explains how 130nm pricing works and when it is the right choice.
130nm is commonly selected for:
Key advantages include:
130nm wafer cost depends on:
Compared to 180nm, mask costs and wafer pricing are higher — but still far below advanced nodes.
MPW is available at 130nm, but with more constraints than 180nm:
MPW at 130nm is commonly used for:
It is less forgiving than 180nm, but still a strong prototyping option.
MPW is typically preferred when:
Full mask becomes attractive when:
At 130nm, the transition from MPW to full mask often happens earlier than at 180nm.
As integration increases, so does backend complexity:
These factors can outweigh wafer cost differences and should be considered early.
Choosing MPW or full mask at 130nm depends on:
👉 👉 Use the MPW vs Full Mask decision tool
130nm offers a strong balance between maturity and integration. MPW is valuable, but less forgiving than at older nodes. Cost decisions at 130nm should be driven by stability and backend reality, not just wafer price.