Power problems rarely show up as a single failure.
They appear as small compromises: a bigger battery, a thicker enclosure, a thermal pad, a lower clock speed, a disabled feature. Each compromise feels manageable. Over time, they shape the product in ways no one originally intended.
For many teams, power is the first real signal that FPGA is no longer the right platform.
This article explains why FPGA power efficiency stops scaling, when ASIC becomes the only realistic option, and how to recognize the moment before power quietly kills your product roadmap.
FPGA power inefficiency is easy to ignore at the beginning.
Early products are often:
At this stage, power is “good enough”. The FPGA works, schedules move forward, and optimization feels optional.
The problem is that FPGA power scales poorly as products mature.
As products evolve, usage patterns change.
More features run simultaneously. Duty cycles increase. Customers expect longer battery life or quieter systems. Suddenly, power becomes a constraint instead of a detail.
Common breaking points include:
At this point, software and RTL optimizations deliver diminishing returns.
FPGA power inefficiency is not a bug. It is structural.
FPGA architectures trade efficiency for flexibility:
These costs are acceptable when flexibility matters more than efficiency. They become prohibitive when efficiency becomes the product differentiator.
No amount of optimization can remove this structural overhead.
ASIC removes the flexibility tax.
By tailoring logic, memory, clocking, and power domains to the exact workload, ASIC can achieve:
The result is not incremental improvement. It is often orders of magnitude better energy efficiency compared to FPGA implementations of the same function.
Teams often frame the problem as “power optimization”.
In reality, power pressure usually signals deeper misalignment:
At this stage, continuing on FPGA is not a neutral decision. It is a strategic choice to accept recurring cost, size, and performance penalties.
ASIC does not make sense for every product.
But it becomes difficult to avoid when:
These conditions rarely reverse themselves.
The most common mistake is waiting until power issues are obvious to everyone.
By then:
The goal is not to jump into ASIC prematurely.
The goal is to recognize when power efficiency has become non-negotiable.
If power is shaping your product decisions, it is time to step back and ask a simpler question.
Does ASIC make sense for this product now, later, or not at all?
That question should be answered before spending more time on incremental FPGA optimization.
Run the 2-minute ASIC or Not? Decision Wizard to get a clear, non-sales recommendation based on power, volume, and readiness.
👉 /asic-or-not